Lecture from: 27.03.2024 | Video: Video ETHZ
Review: Theorem on Inverse Mappings
If is an interval and is continuous and strictly monotonic, then its inverse function is also continuous and strictly monotonic.
/Semester-2/Analysis-1/Lecture-Notes-2024/attachments/Pasted-image-20250408105158.png)
Imagine two number lines, one representing the interval and the other representing the image of under , which is . We have points on the interval . The function maps these points to on , such that . The inverse function goes in the opposite direction, from back to .
The key idea is that: converges to if and only if converges to .
Example
Let (positive integers). Consider the function:
This function is continuous, strictly monotonically increasing, and surjective on .
According to the theorem on inverse mappings, the inverse function also exists and is continuous, strictly monotonically increasing, and surjective. This inverse function is:
which is the -th root function.
/Semester-2/Analysis-1/Lecture-Notes-2024/attachments/Pasted-image-20250408105245.png)
The Real Exponential Function
Recall: Definition and Properties of Exponential Function
- Definition: The exponential function is defined by the power series:
- Addition Theorem: For all :
- Alternative Representation:
Theorem: Properties of Real Exponential Function
The exponential function is continuous, strictly monotonically increasing, and surjective.
Proof
For , we have:
Image of
Since , all terms in the series are non-negative, and the first two terms are . Thus, for , . In particular for and .
Furthermore, . This implies . Since for , we have for .
Therefore, for all . Hence, the image of is contained in , i.e., .
Strictly Monotonically Increasing
For , consider . Since , we know . Also, since , we have:
If , then , so , and therefore . This shows that is strictly monotonically increasing.
Fact: for all
For and , we have the Bernoulli inequality: . Thus, for , we have .
Taking the limit as :
Continuity at 0
Consider . From the fact, we have and .
Since , we have , which implies (since for ).
Thus, for :
Consider the limits as :
Since and are continuous at , by the Sandwich Lemma (Squeeze Theorem) for sequential continuity, is continuous at . (Compare with the solution to the clicker question from last time).
/Semester-2/Analysis-1/Lecture-Notes-2024/attachments/Pasted-image-20250408111735.png)
Continuity at
For all , we use the addition theorem:
Let . Due to the continuity of at , there exists such that for all , we have .
From , for all with , let , so . Then:
Using the inequality :
Thus, for , we have . This shows that is continuous at .
Surjectivity
For , since . So .
Also, .
By the Intermediate Value Theorem, for any interval , since is continuous, the image of the interval under must contain . That is, .
Since this holds for all , we have:
But, .
Therefore, . We already knew . Combining both, we get . Thus, is surjective.
Natural Logarithm: Inverse of Exponential Function
The inverse mapping of is called the natural logarithm, denoted as .
(also sometimes denoted as ).
Corollary: Properties of the Natural Logarithm
The natural logarithm is strictly monotonically increasing, continuous, and bijective.y
For all , the following functional equation holds:
Proof
The theorem about inverse mappings gives us all properties except for the functional equation.
For :
Apply to both sides of the equation:
Since is the inverse of , we have:
/Semester-2/Analysis-1/Lecture-Notes-2024/attachments/Pasted-image-20250408105549.png)
General Powers
For and , we define the general power:
Alternatively, we can write .
In particular, for :
Corollary: Properties of General Powers
-
For , the function:
is continuous, strictly monotonically increasing, and bijective.
-
For , the function:
is continuous, strictly monotonically decreasing, and bijective.
-
For :
-
For :
-
For :
Proof
Consider the composition of functions for :
Since , multiplication by , and are continuous functions, their composition is also continuous on .
For , all arrows in the diagram represent bijective mappings. Therefore, the composition is also bijective for .
-
For : all arrows represent strictly monotonically increasing functions. The composition of strictly monotonically increasing functions is strictly monotonically increasing. Thus, is strictly monotonically increasing for .
-
For : and are strictly monotonically increasing, but multiplication by is strictly monotonically decreasing. So we have: (strictly increasing) (strictly decreasing) (strictly increasing) = strictly monotonically decreasing. Thus, is strictly monotonically decreasing for .
-
Property (3): By definition, . Taking of both sides:
because is the inverse of .
-
Property (4):
Using the addition theorem for :
-
Property (5): (Exercise)
Convergence of Function Sequences
Let be a set. A function sequence (real-valued) is a mapping:
where is the set of functions from to . Thus, each is a function .
We write a function sequence as or simply .
For each , we obtain a sequence of real numbers .
Definition: Pointwise Convergence
The function sequence converges pointwise to a function if for all :
Example: Pointwise Convergence of
Let , and for . Does converge pointwise?
For : . For : .
Thus, converges pointwise to a function defined by:
Remark: The limit function is not continuous on (it is discontinuous at ). (Namely, discontinuous at 1).
Definition: Uniform Convergence
The sequence of functions converges uniformly (in ) to if:
is independent of !
Compare with pointwise convergence:
may depend on !
Visualization of Uniform Convergence
/Semester-2/Analysis-1/Lecture-Notes-2024/attachments/Pasted-image-20250408134116.png)
Imagine a function and an “-tube” around it, defined by and . For uniform convergence, for any given , there exists an such that for all , the graph of lies completely within this -tube around for all in the domain .
Uniform Convergence Condition:
Example Again: Non-Uniform Convergence
Consider again on , with pointwise limit function .
/Semester-2/Analysis-1/Lecture-Notes-2024/attachments/Pasted-image-20250408132432.png)
Sketch the -tube around . For any , the function for will, near , leave the -tube around .
Explanation: For every , leaves the -tube around near .
Therefore, does not converge uniformly to on . The convergence is only pointwise, not uniform.